Advantages of the New World Translation:
"Between-the-Lines" Translations of the Bible
MANUSCRIPTS have been written by scribes with the inspired Greek
Scriptures on the one side of the page and the Latin Vulgate translation
alongside on the opposite side of the same page. This allowed for a comparing of
the two language texts. Had the Latin translation of the whole Bible as made by
the Catholic translator Jerome been made with the "correct words of truth"?
Well, let those who know Latin and Greek compare the two texts and see for
themselves.
In the year 1528 an Italian monk named Sanctes Pagninus published in Lyons,
France, a work on which he had labored for thirty years. Its Latin title,
translated into English, is "A New Translation of the Old and the New
Testament." The translation was, of course, into Latin. Later an edition of this
was published in Lyons, in 1542, by Servetus. However, in the meantime, along
came the Spanish priest and Orientalist named Arias Montanus. King Philip II of
Spain called him to labor at a projected Polyglot Bible, which the king was
causing to be made at the suggestion of the famous printer, Plantin. Finally, in
1569-1572, this Bible was printed in Antwerp. Its Latin title, translated into
English, is "The Sacred Bible in Hebrew, Chaldaic, Greek and Latin, of Philip
II, King, Catholic in Piety and Study, toward the Sacrosanct Church’s Use,"
printed by Plantin, in eight (8) volumes, folio size. Because of the place where
printed it is generally called the "Antwerp Polyglot." Sometimes it is called
the "Royal Bible," because of the patronage of King Philip II; and sometimes,
the "Plantinian Bible," after the printer.
In this Antwerp Polyglot the Spanish priest Arias Montanus incorporated a
correction of the Latin translation of the Bible by Sanctes Pagninus. Years
later, Arias Montanus died, in 1598. In the year 1599 and the years 1610-1613
editions of the Latin text of the Bible by Pagninus appeared, which editions
gave an interlinear and word-for-word translation of the Hebrew with the Hebrew
vowel points and with the Latin translation appearing above the Hebrew text.
This Hebrew-Latin Bible was long considered the most convenient Hebrew Bible for
those beginning to learn Hebrew. The Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society of
Pennsylvania possesses original copies of the interlinear translation printed by
the Plantinian printshop, and the eleven volumes bear the dates of 1610, 1611,
1612, 1613 and 1615. Volume I, containing the Bible books Genesis and Exodus
bears the Latin title, which, translated into English, is "Hebrew Bible with
Interlinear Latin Interpretation of Sanctes Pagninus of Lucca."
The tenth volume, which begins with the Gospel of Matthew, bears the title that,
translated into English, reads: "Greek New Testament with the Common Latin
Interpretation Inserted in the Lines of the Greek Context, which interpretation,
indeed,.. . expressing the sense, evidently, rather than the words, is placed
alongside in the margin of the book, and another of the Blessed Arias Montanus
the Spaniard,..." In this volume the Latin translation appears above the Greek
text, word for word.
Thus at the close of the sixteenth century and beginning of the seventeenth
century we have this interlinear and word-for-word translation of the Bible
appearing. The foregoing interlinear material was incorporated in the Polyglot
Bible, which was published in 1654-1657 by the noted British prelate, Dr. Brian
Walton. Original copies of this massive work, in eight large volumes, are
possessed by the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania. The
heading above the interlinear section for the Hebrew text and the heading above
that for the Greek text mention the Italian monk Pagninus and the Spanish priest
Arias Montanus to show the origin of the material.
Two hundred years later comes forth something more practical for Bible students
in general. In the year 1857 Benjamin Wilson, a newspaper editor in Geneva,
Illinois, U.S.A., published the first section of his interlinear translation of
the inspired Greek Scriptures. The final section was issued in 1863. It was
issued as one bound volume in 1864 and was called "The Emphatic Diaglott." The
name "Diaglott" means, literally, "through tongue," but is understood to signify
"interlinear." In 1902 the copyright and plates of the Diaglott were bought from
the Fowler & Wells Company of New York city and were presented as a gift to the
Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society, Charles Taze Russell being then president of
the Society.
In the broad left-hand column of each page the Diaglott presents the Greek text,
using the recension made by the German Dr. J. J. Griesbach in 1775-1777, and
under each Greek word is presented its English equivalent. In the slim
right-hand column of each page is presented a modern English translation as made
by Benjamin Wilson.
It was through The Emphatic Diaglott that the Society’s first president, C. T.
Russell, learned that the inspired Greek Scriptures speak of the second
"presence" of Christ, for the Diaglott translated the Greek word "parousia"
correctly as "presence," and not as "coming" like the King James Version Bible.
Accordingly when C. T. Russell began publishing the new Bible magazine in July
of 1879, he called it Zion’s Watch Tower and Herald of Christ~ Presence. Today,
this magazine is entitled "The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom," and is
published in 125 languages. Apparently, in first naming the magazine in 1879
Editor Russell was unaware that in 1862, or a year before The Emphatic Diaglott
was completed, Dr. Robert Young had published in Edinburgh, Scotland, the Bible
translation called "Young’s Literal Translation of the Holy Bible" and that this
translation also translated the Greek word "parousia" as "presence" and not as
"coming." He also produced the Young's Analytical Concordance to the Bible,
which, on page 188, column 1, shows parousia to mean "a being alongside," or
"presence." The Watch Tower issue of April, 1883, recommended this Concordance
to Bible students.
After The Emphatic Diaglott there came other interlinear translations of the
Sacred Scriptures. In the year 1877 there was published in London, England, by
Samuel Bagster and Sons, Limited, what was called "The Englishman’s Greek New
Testament," giving an interlinear word-for-word translation under the Greek text
of Stephanus of 1550, along with the King James Authorized Version of 1611 in
the outer column of each page. Later, in 1960, this same publishing company
brought out The Interlinear Greek-English New Testament. This presented in the
right-hand column of each page the Greek text as compiled by the German scholar
Eberhard Nestle as of 1898 with a word-for-word translation underneath as made
by Dr. Alfred Marshall. Alongside, in the left-hand column of each page, was
printed the King James or Authorized Version translation. As for an interlinear
translation of the Hebrew Scriptures, there was published in Chicago, Illinois,
U.S.A., in 1896, The Interlinear Literal Translation of the Hebrew Old
Testament. Only volume one has appeared, containing Genesis and Exodus, the
interlinear translation being done by George Ricker Berry, Ph.D.
A NEW INTERLINEAR TRANSLATION
And in 1969 at the "Peace on Earth" International Assemblies of Jehovah’s
Witnesses, there was released to the reading public The Kingdom Interlinear
Translation of the Greek Scriptures. This is a clothbound book of 1,184 pages.
The Greek text that it uses is that prepared and published by Westcott and Hort
in 1881. Underneath this is printed a literal word-for-word translation. In the
right-hand column alongside on each page is presented the modern-day translation
as found in the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures in a revised
edition. However, in the interlinear literal translation of the Greek the
English words are not taken bodily or directly from the New World Translation
and placed under the appropriate Greek word. No! But under each Greek word is
placed its basic meaning, according to its grammatical construction, whether
this agrees literally with the New World Translation or not. What we as Bible
students should want is what the original Greek text says. Only by getting this
basic meaning can we determine whether the New World Translation or any other
Bible translation is right or not.
For example, in Matthew 8:5 the New World Translation uses the expression "army
officer" but in the interlinear translation under the Greek word you read
"centurion," because that is what the Greek text literally calls this army man.
In Mark 6:21 the words "military commanders" are found, but under the Greek word
you read "chiliarchs," meaning a commander of a thousand soldiers, for that is
what the Greek word literally calls this army officer. In Acts 19:4 1 the New
World Translation has the word "assembly," but the interlinear reading says
"ecclesia," like the Greek. In this particular verse it does not mean a "church"
or "congregation," as the word does elsewhere. Thus we learn more specific
details.
The Kingdom Interlinear Translation contains and preserves for us both the
Foreword and the Appendix as found in the New World Translation of the Christian
Greek Scriptures, as published in the year 1950. These two features are very
vital, because The Kingdom Interlinear Translation contains footnotes that refer
the reader to such Foreword and Appendix and also to an Explanation of the
Symbols Used in the Marginal References. For instance, those footnotes will
refer you to the Foreword in order that you may learn why, in the New World
Translation, the divine name Jehovah appears in its translation of the Greek
Scriptures.
Of course, the Westcott and Hort text does not contain God’s name Jehovah or
Yahweh by itself. But in Revelation 19:1, 3, 4, 6 the Greek text does contain
the word Hallelouiá and beneath this Greek word each time the interlinear
translation renders it literally "Hallelujah." This is really a Hebrew phrase
and it means "Praise YOU Jah," this word "Jah" being an abbreviation for
Jehovah. Hence the New World Translation in the right-hand column renders it,
"Praise Jah, YOU people!" In other places where the New World Translation uses
the divine name Jehovah, the interlinear literal translation puts "God," or
"Lord," or "the Lord," under the corresponding words in the Westcott and Hort
Greek text. But the footnotes show where Hebrew translations of the inspired
Greek Scriptures use God’s name Jehovah in those places. The footnotes also show
where even The Emphatic Diaglott uses the name Jehovah in a number of places in
its modern-day translation, but not in the interlinear.
The English word "soul" is much misunderstood, most religious people thinking
the Bible’s use of the word makes it mean that man has an immortal, invisible
soul inside him that departs from the human body at death. With The Kingdom
Interlinear Translation you can find out that this is not true, for the
interlinear reading shows "soul" under wherever the Greek word psy~khe’ occurs.
In 1 Corinthians 2:14 and l Corinthians 15:44, 46 and elsewhere you will find in
the interlinear the adjective form "soulical," for the Greek word above
ispsykhy~kos’, which the New World Translation renders as "physical," not
"psychic." Matthew 10:28 speaks of the soul or psyche as being destroyed, and
Revelation 16:3 speaks of the soul or psyche as dying. The human soul is not
immortal.
The Kingdom Interlinear Translation plainly shows that the common Greek in which
Jesus’ disciples wrote the inspired Greek Scriptures did not contain the
indefinite articles "a" and "an." How so? Because nowhere in the interlinear
English translation will you find those indefinite articles. This is very
important, for these indefinite articles can make a difference in meaning. For
instance, there can be a difference between "God" and "a god," can there not?
Especially so in cases where the Greek uses the definite article "the" before
the title "God." In such cases, the interlinear will read "the God" (or "the
god"). But in cases where the Greek expression "the God" refers to the one whom
Trinitarians call "God the Father," the interlinear readings of the translations
produced by Samuel Bagster and Sons, Limited, omit the definite article "the"
even though the Greek definite article is there in the text. The Emphatic
Diaglott does not hesitate to put the word "the" under the Greek definite
article when it occurs before the title "God."
In this connection, let us take those controversial verses of John 1:1, 2, which
the clergymen of Christendom resort to in order to prove their doctrine of a
Trinity or One God in Three Persons, as God the Father, God the Son and God the
Holy Spirit. In these verses the Greek term Logos means "Word." So the
Diaglott’s interlinear wording reads: "In a beginning was the Word, and the Word
was with the God, and a god was the Word. This was in a beginning with the God."
However, in its modern-language reading it drops the article "the" before "God"
and puts the title "GOD" in all capital letters. Also, it drops the article "a"
from before "beginning" and from before "god" and puts "the" before "beginning"
and puts "god" with an initial "G," thus, "God." This way the modern-language
rendering reads: "In the Beginning was the LOGOS, and the LOGOS was with GOD,
and the LOGOS was God. This was in the Beginning with GOD." So, only the kind of
type used shows the difference between "the God" and "a god."
Other Bible translations drop all use of the indefinite article "a" and insert
the definite article before the word "beginning" and drop the definite article
"the" before God. For example, the King James or Authorized Version reads: "In
the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The
same was in the beginning with God."-John 1:1, 2.
However, in its interlinear word-for-word rendering, The Kingdom Interlinear
Translation reads: "In beginning was the Word, and the Word was toward the God,
and god was the Word. This (one) was in beginning toward the God." From this
literal reading it is apparent that the writer, the apostle John, is speaking of
two individuals and is showing that the one who was with the Other is different
from that Other One. Hence the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures
endeavors to show this difference and, with grammatical correctness and
doctrinal correctness, it reads: "In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word
was with God, and the Word was a god. This one was in [the] beginning with God."
To avoid saying "a, god," other Bible translations like An American Translation
and the one by Dr. James Moffatt say "divine"; and The New English Bible-New
Testament says "what God was," that is to say, "what God was, the Word was."
Thus even these Bible translations cannot be used to prove the Trinity doctrine.
Trinitarians have no grounds for complaining against this use of "a" before
"god," because all other Bible translations use the indefinite articles "a" and
"an" hundreds of times before words although they are nowhere found in the
original Greek text. Not only that, but those translations repeatedly insert the
definite article "the" before certain words where it does not occur in the
Greek. Take, for example, many cases of the word "spirit" or the words "holy
spirit." There are cases in the Greek text where the definite article "the" does
not occur before those words. But the Trinitarian translators will slant their
translation by inserting a "the" before "spirit" or "holy spirit," to make it
read "the spirit" and "the holy spirit." In such cases they will also capitalize
the word "Spirit" in order to give the reader the impression that it refers to
some intelligent person, the Third Person of some Trinity.
In such cases The Kingdom Interlinear Translation, in its word-for-word
translation, shows that there is no "the" there, and the New World Translation
does not there insert a "the" or capitalize the word "spirit," but lets it read
plain "spirit," and "holy spirit." So, in Acts 6:3, the apostles say to the
Jerusalem congregation: "Search out for yourselves seven certified men from
among you, full of spirit and wisdom." Then, in Matthew 3:11 John the Baptist
says concerning the coming Jesus Christ: "That one will baptize you people with
holy spirit and with fire." This rendering of the Greek text agrees with the
Bible truth that God’s spirit is his invisible active force that is used for a
holy purpose, in a holy manner.
By means of his holy spirit God inspired the writing of all the Holy Scriptures.
In 2 Timothy 3:16 we read: "All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for
teaching." But, instead of the words "inspired of God," the interlinear
word-for-word reading shows that the one Greek word here used means literally
"God-breathed," that is, breathed by God. As it were, God breathed upon the men
whom he inspired to write the Holy Bible.
Back in the apostles’ days there were not too many handwritten copies of the
Holy Scriptures at hand, neither were there books written about the Bible and in
explanation of it. Hence much instruction in the Bible had to be done by reading
Bible verses out loud to students and with explanations by word of mouth. So, in
Galatians 6:6 we read: "Moreover, let anyone who is being orally taught the word
share in all good things with the one who gives such oral teaching." But the
interlinear reading brings out the basic sense of the Greek words used
respecting oral teaching by using the expressions "the (one) being sounded down
to" and "the (one) sounding down." This vividly shows that the sound of the
teacher’s voice went down into the ears of his Bible student. This made the
course of instruction one of oral teaching.
[Next Article]